This Is Marketing Genius
If I were to tell you that I've
got a sure fire marketing strategy that you can use to increase substantially
the sales of your products and services: would you want to hear about it? Of
course you would.
If I told you that I'm going to
give you the benefit of my advice free of charge: would that please you? Of course
it would.
Let me then tell you what my
piece of marketing genius involves. It involves a very clever loyalty/reward
marketing scheme. A scheme that you might call a buy one get two free
promotion. A promotion that involves you selling one of your products or
services and giving away two of somebody else’s products or services.
Like I said; this is a sure fire
way to increase your sales. It really is a little bit of marketing genius. I should
consider charging outrageously for this advice.
Now that you are armed with this
information: are you going to give my promotional scheme a shot? Of course you’re
not.
I know what you’re thinking. You’re
thinking that this is not a piece of marketing genius it's a piece of business
suicide. Who in her right mind is going to sell one product or service and give
away two others? Not just any two other products or services but two others
that are from another company!
I appreciate why you might be a
little sceptical, perhaps even a touch cynical. No marketer would ever dream of
doing something like that: would she? Even if she dreamt up such a scheme, she’d
never be foolish enough to run it by her bosses: would she? Even if she ran it
by her bosses they’d never accept it: would they?
Surely running with a scheme like
this would demand a catalogue of crazy miscalculations and a display of ineptitude
on a colossal scale? Precisely. Let me, then, tell you about the Hoover flights
promotion fiasco.
If you saw this offer: buy one Hoover get two flights free…
…would you refuse it? It is very
difficult to believe many people would refuse an offer like that. Believe it or
not that’s exactly
the offer that Hoover made in the UK in 1992. And yes people found it difficult
to resist.
The promotion promised two free
seats on flights to Europe or America to any customers buying a Hoover product
that cost £100 or more. It would be just a tad of an understatement to say that
Hoover sold a lot of units.
The public went wild for Hoover
vacuums. Something like 200, 000 were sold – or if you like about 500 jumbo
jets worth of free seats. Hoover had to take on extra staff to meet the production
demands. However, as The
Independent reported in 1998, although there were winners – airline
companies and the tax man:
“The cost to Hoover…was enormous. The [£30 million] of sales generated by the
offer was dwarfed by the [£50 million] it spent on airline tickets. And the publicity
heaped on the company was devastating. In the end Hoover paid the ultimate
price…when its European arm lost its independence.”
If
it’s too good to be true…
…it usually is too good to be
true, but not if it’s Hoover offering flights in return for the sale of one of
its products: back in 1992 this offer was true and it was good. It was good if
you were a purchaser of a Hoover. It wasn't so good if you were any other
stakeholder in Hoover.
The obvious question is how such
a scheme got the go ahead? My guess is that it was a horrendous miscalculation.
Those making the decisions probably had discussions around how many people
would actually take up the flights and concluded that a large number of people
simple would not take up their seats, particularly if the terms in the small
print are sufficiently onerous. They hadn't counted on the Hoover purchasing
public's tenacity. As the
BBC reported:
‘The promotion was simply too
generous. Spend just £100 on any Hoover product and two free return flights…could
be yours - though only if you were determined enough to make it through the
maze of small print and Hoover's travel agents' attempts to sell you profitable
extras designed to offset the cost of the promotion.”
When it became clear that people
were not being put off by the small print hurdles Hoover made the monumental PR
blunder of putting further obstacles in the way of people wishing to fly. As Rob
Page explains
The outcome was a total disaster and Hoover’s Free Flights Rewards program quickly became a Free Flights Fiasco.”
A Great
Marketing Disaster
The Hoover case is used in
marketing classes all over the country – and abroad - as a perfect example of a
marketing disaster and how not to run a loyalty/reward scheme.
One question that is less often asked
is why Hoover didn't just pull the plug when things were going from bad to worse
to career ruining calamity? If it is addressed, the answer that question that is usually
explored is that to have pulled the plug would have added further PR woe to what
was already a cataclysmic marketing disaster.
Another answer that might be
explored in law schools rather than marketing schools is that it may well have
been too late to cancel the campaign in many cases. Had Hoover cancelled the
campaign they may well have encountered one of the thorny issues of English
contract law.
The thorny issue is all to do
with something called unilateral contracts. Had Hoover cancelled, some of its
customers may have been able to argue that they were already contracted with
Hoover for the flight tickets even thought they had not yet purchased a Hoover.
And that nugget of English contract law will form the subject of another post.
And that nugget of English contract law will form the subject of another post.
Garry Costain is the Managing Director of Caremark Thanet, a domiciliary care provider with offices in Margate, Kent. Caremark Thanet provides home care services throughout the Isle of Thanet. Garry can be contacted on 01843 235910 or email garry.costain@caremark.co.uk. You can also visit Caremark Thanet's website at www.caremark.co.uk/thanet.
No comments:
Post a Comment